If you believed I was instantiating a new sense of reality moulding the answer is yes.

Humans have an appealing use of in-depth memory that far surpasses any machine based system though the use of it is utilised in a human based manner.
It makes no sense to include machine based forms of memory since they are presented for human consumption which can be absolutely fine for a recipe where I need consistent outcomes. In the end eventually all machines need a “live” conscious observer at the very least.

Perhaps Machines dream to be Live.

Every human being is unique. Twins are not “basically the same” a clone is not “basically the same” and even should you be able to create an exact physical copy with for whatever purpose a copy of all of that human being’s experiences until the moment of the doubles creation they are still not “basically the same” and nothing can accept that in the ‘verse. In the end eventually all humans need a “spirit” conscious observer at the very least.

Perhaps Humans dream to be Spirit.

Copies don’t actually exist we just make something new with the same information (but that is a copy right?) but it is an acceptable social construct within humanity. It’s a nice word.
I understand your objection since everyone was just given a duplicate worksheet last night. That’s a copy right. Yes. Sure.

Nothing is the same but we can all get on and share that information. Fact. We can just as easily all get off too. I said what I said.

Regards,

Alexander / Zenchi